ЩОДЕННИКОВЕ ДОСЛІДЖЕННЯ ДОСВІДУ ВИКОРИСТАННЯ ТЕСТУ ВИКРИВЛЕННЯ УВАГИ

Ключові слова: викривлення уваги, щоденникові дослідження, психометрика, тривога, депресія.

Анотація

Дане дослідження щоденникового типу направлене на оцінку тесту викривлення уваги (AttentionBias-AB) на платформі Anima на основі технології стеження за поглядом через веб камеру. Парадигма АВ вимірює варіації у відповідях на емоційні стимули різної валентності, забезпечуючи методологічну основу для оцінки психічних станів. Було розроблено опитувальник ASMQ для доповнення айтрекінгових метрик. Лінійні змішані моделі були застосовані для виявлення взаємозв’язку між суб’єктивними відповідями та айтрекінговими показниками, доводячи їх узгодженість. Кореляційний аналіз підтвердив конкурентну валідність AB-тесту. Психометрична оцінка за допомогою EFA, CFA продемонструвала двофакторну структуру ASMQ, яка пояснює 49.7% дисперсії. Отримані показники внутрішньої узгодженості на задовільному рівні.

Посилання

1. Anima. (2024a, April 19). Animahelp. Neironaukovyi treker psykhichnoho stanu. [Neuroscientific Mental Wellness Tracker] https://ua.anima.help/ [in Ukrainian].
2. Anima. (2024b, April 21). Umovy Anima. [Terms and Conditions] https://ua.anima. help/terms-and-conditions#legal_tc [in Ukrainian].
3. Anima Blog. (2023a, June 13). Yak Chytaty Dani Anima u Testi Na Depresiiu: Poiasnennia Ta Rekomendatsii. [Understanding Your Anima Depression Results: A Brief Overview] https://shorturl.at/gkBQ6 [in Ukrainian].
4. Anima Blog. (2023b, August 16). Yak Chytaty Dani Anima u Testi Na Tryvohu: Poiasnennia Ta Rekomendatsii. [Interpreting Your Anima Anxiety Results: A Brief Overview] https://shorturl.at/ciBFQ [in Ukrainian].
5. Anderson, A.R., & Fowers, B.J. (2020). Lifestyle behaviors, psychological distress, and well-being: A daily diary study. Social Science & Medicine, 263, 113263. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113263
6. Armstrong, T., & Olatunji, B.O. (2012). Eye tracking of attention in the affective disorders: A meta-analytic review and synthesis. Clinical Psychology Review, 32(8), 704–723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2012.09.004
7. Clauss, K., Gorday, J.Y., & Bardeen, J. R. (2022). Eye tracking evidence of threat- related attentional bias in anxiety- and fear-related disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 93, 102142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. cpr.2022.102142
8. Conner, T.S., & Silvia, P.J. (2015). Creative days: A daily diary study of emotion, personality, and everyday creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(4), 463–470. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000022
9. De Beurs, E., Den Hollander-Gijsman, M.E., Helmich, S., & Zitman, F.G. (2007). The tripartite model for assessing symptoms of anxiety and depression: Psychometrics of the Dutch version of the mood and anxiety symptoms questionnaire. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45(7), 1609–1617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2006.07.004
10. Disner, S.G., Beevers, C.G., Haigh, E.A.P., & Beck, A.T. (2011). Neural mechanisms of the cognitive model of depression. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 12(8), 467–477. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3027
11. Epskamp, S. (2022). semPlot: Path Diagrams and Visual Analysis of Various SEM Packages’ Output. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=semPlot
12. Everaert, J., & Koster, E.H.W. (2020). The interplay among attention, interpretation, and memory biases in depression: Revisiting the combined cognitive bias hypothesis. В Cognitive Biases in Health and Psychiatric Disorders (с. 193–213). Elsevier. https://doi. org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816660-4.00009-X
13. Experience, W.L. in R.-B.U. (2016, June 5). Diary Studies: Understanding Long- Term User Behavior and Experiences. Nielsen Norman Group. https://www.nngroup. com/articles/diary-studies/
14. Gallucci, M. (2019). GAMLj: General analyses for linear models. [jamovi module]. Retrieved from https://gamlj.github.io/
15. Gallucci, M. (2020). Model goodness of fit in GAMLj Retrieved from https://gamlj.github.io/details_goodness.html
16. Goldberg, S.B., Hanley, A.W., Baldwin, S.A., Bernstein, A., & Garland, E.L. (2020). Does mindfulness practice promote psychological functioning or is it the other way around? A daily diary study. Psychotherapy, 57(3), 310–322. https://doi.org/10.1037/ pst0000286
17. Grahek, I., Everaert, J., Krebs, R.M., & Koster, E.H.W. (2018). Cognitive Control in Depression: Toward Clinical Models Informed by Cognitive Neuroscience. Clinical Psychological Science, 6(4), 464–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702618758969
18. Grupe, D.W., & Nitschke, J.B. (2013). Uncertainty and anticipation in anxiety: An integrated neurobiological and psychological perspective. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14(7), 488–501. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3524
19. Higgins-Chen, A.T., Abdallah, S.B., Dwyer, J.B., Kaye, A. P., Angarita, G.A., & Bloch, M.H. (2019). Severe Illness Anxiety Treated by Integrating Inpatient Psychotherapy With Medical Care and Minimizing Reassurance. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 10, 150. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00150
20. Iida, M., Shrout, P.E., Laurenceau, J.-P., & Bolger, N. (2012). Using diary methods in psychological research. In H. Cooper, P.M. Camic, D.L. Long, A.T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K.J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol 1: Foundations, planning, measures, and psychometrics. (с. 277–305). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13619-016
21. iMotions. (2023). iMotionsWebET 3.0 Webcam Based Eye Tracking—Whitepaper v3. https://go.imotions.com/WebET3Whitepaper
22. Insel, T., Cuthbert, B., Garvey, M., Heinssen, R., Pine, D.S., Quinn, K., Sanislow, C., & Wang, P. (2010). Research Domain Criteria (RDoC): Toward a New Classification Framework for Research on Mental Disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 167(7), 748–751. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.09091379
23. Kellough, J.L., Beevers, C.G., Ellis, A.J., & Wells, T.T. (2008). Time course of selective attention in clinically depressed young adults: An eye tracking study. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 46(11), 1238–1243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2008.07.004
24. Kline, R.B., & Little, T.D. (2023). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (5th ed.). The Guilford Press.
25. LeMoult, J., &Gotlib, I.H. (2019). Depression: A cognitive perspective. Clinical Psychology Review, 69, 51–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2018.06.008
26. Lüdecke, Ben-Shachar, Patil & Makowski (2020). Extracting, Computing and Exploring the Parameters of Statistical Models using R. CRAN.
27. Nezlek, J. (2020). Diary studies in social and personality psychology: An introduction with some recommendations and suggestions. Social Psychological Bulletin, 15(2), e2679. https://doi.org/10.32872/spb.2679
28. Open AI. (2024). Chat GPT 4 Turbo (Version 4) [Software]. Open AI. https://chat. openai.com/chat
29. Overgaard, M. (2006). Introspection in Science. Consciousness and Cognition, 15(4), 629–633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2006.10.004
30. Pergamin-Hight, L., Naim, R., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M.J., van IJzendoorn, M.H., & Bar-Haim, Y. (2015). Content specificity of attention bias to threat in anxiety disorders: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 35, 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. cpr.2014.10.005
31. Plummer, F., Manea, L., Trepel, D., & McMillan, D. (2016). Screening for anxiety disorders with the GAD-7 and GAD-2: A systematic review and diagnostic metaanalysis. General Hospital Psychiatry, 39, 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2015.11.005
32. R Core Team (2022). R: A Language and environment for statistical computing. (Version 4.1) [Computer software]. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org. (R packages retrieved from CRAN snapshot 2023-04-07).
33. Revelle, W. (2023). psych: Proceduresfor Psychological, Psychometric, and Personality Research. [R package]. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/package=psych
34. Rosas, H.J., Sussman, A., Sekely, A.C., & Lavdas, A.A. (2023). Using Eye Tracking to Reveal Responses to the Built Environment and Its Constituents. Applied Sciences, 13(21), 12071. https://doi.org/10.3390/app132112071
35. Rosseel, Y., et al. (2023). lavaan: Latent Variable Analysis. [R package]. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/package=lavaan.
36. Schroder, H.S., Devendorf, A., & Zikmund-Fisher, B.J. (2023). Framing depression as a functional signal, not a disease: Rationale and initial randomized controlled trial. Social Science & Medicine, 328, 115995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115995
37. Solonskyi, A. (2024). Attention Bias Diary study. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/RYMNC
38. Taber, K.S. (2018). The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
39. The jamovi project (2023). jamovi. (Version 2.4) [Computer Software]. Retrieved from https://www.jamovi.org
40. Van Rooijen, R., Ploeger, A., & Kret, M.E. (2017). The dot-probe task to measure emotional attention: A suitable measure in comparative studies? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(6), 1686–1717. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1224-1
41. Waechter, S., Nelson, A.L., Wright, C., Hyatt, A., & Oakman, J. (2014). Measuring Attentional Bias to Threat: Reliability of Dot Probe and Eye Movement Indices. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 38(3), 313–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-013- 9588-2
42. Weeks, J.W., Howell, A.N., Srivastav, A., & Goldin, P.R. (2019). “Fear guides the eyes of the beholder”: Assessing gaze avoidance in social anxiety disorder via covert eye tracking of dynamic social stimuli. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 65, 56–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2019.05.005
43. Yang, X., & Krajbich, I. (2021). Webcam-based online eye-tracking for behavioral research. Judgment and Decision Making, 16(6), 1485–1505. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500008512
Опубліковано
2024-03-31
Як цитувати
Solonskyi, A. (2024). ЩОДЕННИКОВЕ ДОСЛІДЖЕННЯ ДОСВІДУ ВИКОРИСТАННЯ ТЕСТУ ВИКРИВЛЕННЯ УВАГИ. Київський журнал сучасної психології та психотерапії, 7, 67-88. https://doi.org/10.48020/mppj.2024.01.05